1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 93 P.3d
  5. 93 P.3d 1086 (2004)
 

AMPARANO v. ASARCO, INC.

No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0162.

93 P.3d 1086 (2004)

208 Ariz. 370

Betty AMPARANO and Raymond Amparano, a married couple, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. ASARCO, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two.

June 16, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Bellovin & Karnas, P.C., By M. David Karnas, Tucson, The Shanker Law Firm, P.L.C., By Howard M. Shanker, Tempe, Thomas A. Zlaket, P.L.L.C., By Thomas A. Zlaket, Tucson, for Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., By Mitchel B. Axler and Brian M. McQuaid, Phoenix, for Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

OPINION

HOWARD, J.

¶ 1 The trial court dismissed appellants Betty and Raymond Amparanos'1 putative class action against defendant ASARCO, Inc.,2 after determining the action had been brought in an improper venue and could not be transferred to a proper venue. Concluding that venue is controlled by the mandatory venue provisions governing real property actions, we affirm the dismissal....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases