BOLL v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 29295.

92 P.3d 1081 (2004)

140 Idaho 334

Hans BOLL and Peggy Boll, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2004 Term.

June 15, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robertson Hepworth Sleete Worst & Stover PLLC, Twin Falls, for Appellants. Jeffrey J. Hepworth argued.

Elam & Burke PA, Boise, for Respondent. Jeffrey A. Thomson argued.


KIDWELL, Justice.

This case is an appeal from a jury verdict, finding no breach of contract by an insurance company and a district court's subsequent application of the "common fund" doctrine to award the Appellants attorney fees for collection expenses in securing repayment of an insurance company's subrogation interest. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 12, 1996, the Appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases