1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 368 F.3d
  5. 368 F.3d 801 (2004)
 

U.S. v. HICKS

No. 03-1838, 03-1849, 03-1878.

368 F.3d 801 (2004)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman HICKS, Radar Tyler, and Driefus Harbin, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 21, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Hennage (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

P. Jeffrey Schlesinger (argued), Crown Point, IN, Kevin W. Marshall, Smith & Marshall, Hammond, IN, Claudia Traficante, Portage, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CUDAHY, POSNER, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Herman Hicks, Radar Tyler, and Driefus Harbin of, among other offenses, conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and conspiring to distribute more than fifty grams of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). In this consolidated appeal, all three defendants contest the sufficiency of the conspiracy evidence against them and the district court's decision to allow various acts of violence,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases