1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 874 So.2d
  5. 874 So.2d 228 (2004)
 

BARHAM & ARCENEAUX v. KOZAK

No. 2002 CA 2325.

874 So.2d 228 (2004)

BARHAM & ARCENEAUX v. Charles KOZAK and Mull & Mull (a Louisiana Partnership).

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce S. Kingsdorf, Barrios, Kingsdorf & Casteix, L.L.P., New Orleans, for Plaintiff-in-Cross-Claim/Appellee Mull & Mull, A Louisiana Partnership.

Frank Tomeny, III, Jason L. Melancon, Tomeny & Fisher, Baton Rouge, for Defendant-in-Cross-Claim/Appellant Charles Kozak.

Before: PARRO, McDONALD, and CLAIBORNE, JJ.

PARRO, J.

This case involves a fee dispute among multiple attorneys. An attorney appeals from a judgment dividing fees between him and a law firm on a quantum meruit basis pursuant to an oral fee-sharing agreement, and ordering him to pay 80 percent of the court costs. In its answer to the appeal, the law firm seeks modification of the trial court judgment. For the following reasons, we reverse in part, affirm in part, and render.

Factual and Procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases