1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 684 N.W.2d
  5. 684 N.W.2d 404 (2004)
 

RAY v. MILLER MEESTER ADVERTISING, INC.

No. C3-02-1605.

684 N.W.2d 404 (2004)

Patricia Ludowese RAY, Respondent, v. MILLER MEESTER ADVERTISING, INC., Appellant, Robert V. Miller, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Anthony, Mary L. Knoblauch, Mark D. Wisser, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Susan M. Coler, Teresa K. Patton, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Robert R. Reinhart, Erik T. Nelson, Minneapolis for amicus Minnesota Employment Law Council.

Leslie L. Lienemann, St. Paul, for amicus National Employment Lawyers Association.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether front pay is subject to multiplication under Minn.Stat. § 363.071, subd. 2 (2002).1

Appellant Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. (MMA), a Minnesota-based advertising agency, hired respondent Patricia Ludowese Ray in June of 1996 in the position of Vice President/Group Creative Director. At the time she was hired, Ray had 21

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases