WILD v. BROOKS

No. 03-077.

862 A.2d 225 (2004)

2004 VT 74

George WILD, Jr. v. David BROOKS, et al.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Reargument Denied September 7, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Grayck of Cheney, Brock & Saudek, P.C., Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stephen J. Craddock, Berlin, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and REIBER, JJ.


JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff George Wild initiated this action to permanently enjoin the operation of a commercial shooting range that borders his property. The superior court dismissed Wild's suit after trial, concluding that, at the time of the trial, the terms of the range's Act 250 permit prohibited operations for a period of up to ten years, therefore an injunction could not issue because there was no activity to enjoin and would not likely be any in the foreseeable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases