SOUTHWICK, P.J., for the Court.
¶ 1. Service of process on the defendants was untimely, but the trial court found that good cause for the delay existed. The defendants' appellate argument is that no good cause was ever shown for the eleven day delay in service. Permitting a suit to continue despite a delay in service is a matter for the sound discretion of the trial judge. We find no abuse of that discretion and affirm.
¶ 2. The merits of the litigation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
