1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 679 N.W.2d
  5. 679 N.W.2d 390 (2004)
 

TRANSIT TEAM, INC. v. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

No. A03-1344.

679 N.W.2d 390 (2004)

TRANSIT TEAM, INC., Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, Respondent, Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 18, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Condon, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Perry M. Wilson, III, Angela M. Hall, Steven K. Champlin, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Metropolitan Council.

Charles K. Maier, Erik T. Salveson, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Laidlaw Transit Services.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; ANDERSON, Judge; and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant Transit Team, Inc. challenges the award of the 2003-07 Metro Mobility paratransit service contract to respondent-intervenor Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., contending that (a) the contract award is not legal because respondent Metropolitan Council failed to adopt new procurement standards as required under Minn.Stat. § 473.392 (2002); (b) even if the council could rely on procurement standards adopted by its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases