1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 675 N.W.2d
  5. 675 N.W.2d 361 (2004)
 

TISCHER v. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT

No. A03-845.

675 N.W.2d 361 (2004)

Sandy TISCHER, Respondent, v. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CAMBRIDGE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Malone, Edward P. Sheu, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

John M. LeFevre, Jr., Mary D. Tietjen, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge, and LANSING, Judge, and KALITOWSKI, Judge.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

On appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, the Cambridge Housing and Redevelopment Authority argues that the order should be reversed as a matter of law because the exclusive remedy for Sandy Tischer's breach-of-contract claim is a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals. We agree. Absent statutory authority for a different process, a timely petition for a writ of certiorari is the exclusive method...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases