In the Matter of FRESHWATER WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT RULES, Statewide General Permit, Cranberry Expansion, Promulgated by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 8, 2003.
Decided July 20, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas A. Borden, Newark, argued the cause for appellants, American Littoral Society, Environmental Defense Fund, National Wildlife Federation, New Jersey Audubon Society, New Jersey Environmental Federation, New Jersey Environmental Lobby, New Jersey Public Interest Research Group Citizen Lobby, Inc., Sierra Club, New Jersey Chapter, and Pinelands Preservation Alliance (Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic, attorneys; Edward L. Lloyd, of counsel).
Rachel J. Horowitz, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Chief Justice PORITZ delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case raises questions in respect of the validity of General Permit 23 (GP23), N.J.A.C. 7:7A-5.23, adopted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in 1999.1 Appellants2 claim that GP23, which permits the limited expansion of existing cranberry growing operations in the Pinelands...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.