BRUTOCO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. E032144.

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 866 (2003)

107 Cal.App.4th 1326

BRUTOCO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the County of San Bernardino, Respondent, United Engineering Technology, Inc. and State of California, Department of Transportation, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Review Denied August 13, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Mahoney, Brayton & Soil and Paul M. Mahoney, Claremont, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Bruce A. Behrens, Chief Counsel, David R. Simmes, Deputy Chief Counsel, Ruth W. Yeager and Robert W. Vidor, Assistant Chief Counsel, for Real Party in Interest State of California, Department of Transportation.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest United Engineering Technology, Inc.


OPINION

RICHLI, Acting P.J.

This action involves the procedure to be followed in a contractual arbitration between the State of California (State) and a private party or parties, as governed by the Public Contract Code.1 We find that the trial court correctly declined to consider proposed arbitrators who have not been certified by the Public Works Contract Arbitration Committee, and instead confined itself to persons on that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases