1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 104 S.W.3d
  5. 104 S.W.3d 884 (2003)
 

HONE v. HANAFIN

No. 02-0548.

104 S.W.3d 884 (2003)

William J. HONE and Falk & Fish, L.L.P., Petitioners, v. Bernard M. HANAFIN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Ticer, Law Office of Mark Ticer, Dallas, for Petitioner.

Gerald C. Conley and Linda Richichi Stahl, Andrews & Kurth, L.L.P., Dallas, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, we consider whether Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 requires an appellant to concede that its notice of appeal was untimely in order to satisfy the rule's "reasonable-explanation" requirement.1 The court of appeals held that, because Petitioners did not concede that their appeal was untimely, they did not satisfy Rule 26.3's requirement and therefore were not entitled to an implied extension under Verburgt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases