1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 97 S.W.3d
  5. 97 S.W.3d 888 (2003)
 

MURRAY v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 05-02-00866-CV.

97 S.W.3d 888 (2003)

Walter MURRAY and Magnolia Murray, Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

February 18, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James David Joyce, N. Scott Carpenter, The Carpenter Law Firm, P.C., Plano, for appellants.

Bernardo S. Garza, Callier & Garza, Houston, William Leonard Mennucci, Austin, for appellee.

Before Justices WHITTINGTON, RICHTER, and FRANCIS.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice WHITTINGTON.

This is a subrogation claim. Walter and Magnolia Murray brought this action on behalf of State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company (State Farm) against Ford Motor Company to recover amounts paid to them by State Farm. The trial judge granted Ford's motion for summary judgment based upon the economic loss doctrine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in part, reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases