SCHLIMGEN v. MAY TRUCKING CO.

9803-02267; A107409.

75 P.3d 903 (2003)

189 Or. App. 478

Joseph SCHLIMGEN, Personal Representative for the Estate of Michael F. Schlimgen, deceased, Respondent, v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon T. Carey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Michael T. Garone, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Karen O'Kasey and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Bend.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co., 335 Or. 143, 61 P.3d 923 (2003). In our original decision, we held that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial; that motion should have been granted, we concluded, because the trial court gave the deadlocked jury an improperly coercive verdict-urging instruction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases