BOEING CO. v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF RIDLEY TP.


822 A.2d 153 (2003)

The BOEING COMPANY, Appellant, v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF RIDLEY TOWNSHIP, 409 Smiley, Inc., Wilmarlie, Inc., 291, Inc., Namar, Inc. and MGMRP, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 29, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth U. Witmer, Wayne, for appellant.

Rocco P. Imperatrice, III, Newtown Square, for appellees, 409 Smiley, Inc., Namar, Inc. and Wilmarlie, Inc.

Peter J. Rohana, Media, for appellee, Twp. of Ridley.

BEFORE: COLINS, President Judge, COHN, Judge, and MIRARCHI, Senior Judge.


OPINION BY Judge COHN.

The instant case arises from the Boeing Company (Boeing) challenging the validity of actions taken by the Ridley Township Board of Supervisors (Township) to resolve a number of related lawsuits between the Township and the operators of an adult entertainment facility (AEF) named Smileys.1 Boeing alleges that the Township engaged in spot zoning and contract zoning in the manner by which it settled these cases. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases