1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 831 A.2d
  5. 831 A.2d 140 (2003)
 

CLAUDIO v. DEAN MACHINE CO.

831 A.2d 140 (2003)

Luis CLAUDIO and Sexta Claudio, Individually and as his Wife, v. DEAN MACHINE COMPANY, Incorporated; Burton Industries, American Steel Line, Inc.; North American Brass, Inc.; and Hannum Electric Co. Appeal of Dean Machine, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided February 11, 2003.

Reargument Denied April 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Edwards, Joseph V. Pinto, John A. Orlando, Philadelphia, for Dean Machine Company, Inc.

John B. Day, James J. DeMarco, Philadelphia, for Claudio, Luis and Sexta Claudia, Individually and as his wife.

Before ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

We granted allocatur in this case to consider whether a trial court can, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1 [relating to Post-Trial Relief], conduct a post-trial evidentiary hearing and grant post-trial relief to correct an error when the error alleged is attributable, not to the court, but to the party seeking relief. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that Rule 227.1 is not a vehicle by which a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases