1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 298 B.R.
  5. 298 B.R. 670 (2003)
 

IN RE MARSHALL

No. LA 02-30769 SB.

298 B.R. 670 (2003)

In re J. Howard MARSHALL et ux., Debtors.

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California.

August 26, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Neale, Levene Neale Bender Rankin & Brill, Los Angeles, CA, for debtor.

G. Eric Brunstad, Bingham McCutchen, LLP, Hartford, CT, for Pierce Marshall.

OPINION ON PLAN CONFIRMATION AND MOTION TO DISMISS (NON-CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES)

SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

In this case Pierce Marshall, acting as trustee for three family trusts (collectively referred to as "Pierce"), opposes confirmation of the chapter 111 plan proposed by his brother J. Howard Marshall, III ("Howard") and his wife Ilene O. Marshall. Pierce also moves to dismiss the case....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases