1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 829 A.2d
  5. 829 A.2d 137 (2003)
 

MUHAMMAD v. STATE

No. 380, 2002.

829 A.2d 137 (2003)

Parris MUHAMMAD, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: July 28, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Edinger, Jr., Esquire, and Bernard J. O'Donnell, Esquire (argued), Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellant.

Paul R. Wallace, Esquire (argued), and Elizabeth R. McFarlan, Esquire, Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we consider several claimed errors in a first degree robbery trial. First, we reject appellant's argument that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he displayed what appeared to be a deadly weapon. Second, we hold that the prosecutor should not have argued to the jury that, by offering alternative defenses, appellant was conceding his guilt. Finally, we hold that the trial court should have honored the State's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases