1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 105 S.W.3d
  5. 105 S.W.3d 860 (2003)
 

KING v. STATE

No. 25240.

105 S.W.3d 860 (2003)

James Arthur KING, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

May 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Arthur King, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Chief Judge.

James A. King ("Movant") appeals the motion court's denial of his pro se motion under Rule 29.07(d)1 to withdraw his plea of guilty to tampering in the first degree. Movant alleges his plea of guilty was involuntary because he was incompetent at the time of his plea and his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Movant's incompetence as a defense. We affirm the motion court's denial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases