IN RE CALYPSO ZAMIAS L.P.

Bankruptcy Nos. 01-25077-BM, 01-25079BM. Adversary No. 01-2175-BM.

293 B.R. 668 (2003)

In re CALYPSO ZAMIAS L.P., Debtor. Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership IX, Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership XI, WXI/BUF/W Real Estate Limited Liability Company, WXI/BUF Gen-Par/W, L.L.C., WXI/MLM/W Real Estate Limited Partnership, WXI/MLM Gen-Par/W, L.L.C., W9/MLM Real Estate Limited Partnership, W9/MLM Gen-Par, L.L.C., W9/MLM/B Real Estate Limited Partnership, W9/MLM/B Gen-Par, L.L.C., and W9/MLM/E Real Estate Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs, v. Zamias Services, Inc., Calypso Zamias Limited Partnership, Protesilaus Zamias Limited Partnership, Damian Zamias, Proteus Zamias, L.P., Proteus Zamias Euclid, L.P., Proteus Zamias Brickyard, L.P., First Commonwealth Financial Corporation, d/b/a Cenwest Bank, and Promistar Bank, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

June 4, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Walsh, Esq., Spence, Custer, Saylor, Wolfe & Rose, Johnstown, PA, for debtor.

George M. Cheever, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP, Gary J. Gaertner, Grenen & Birsic, P.C., Michael Kaminski, David W. Lampl, Leech, Tishman, Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA, Jeffrey A. Crossman, M. Colette Gibbons, Stuart L. Larsen, Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arson Co., Cleveland, OH, John R. O'Keefe, Jr., Metz, Schermer & Lewis, LLC, Richard Allen Pollard, Pietragallo, Bosick & Gordon, Peter A. Santos, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, Mark D. Taylor, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld L.L.P., Washington, DC, for creditor.

Kathleen Robb, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S. Trustee.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiffs in this adversary action ("the Whitehall entities") seek to recover the sum of $5,095,701.20 which debtor Zamias Services, Inc. ("ZSI") withdrew at the direction of debtor Damian Zamias ("DZ") from various bank accounts under its control plus interest on this amount. The Whitehall entities also seek a determination that a portion of the interest is entitled to priority as a post-petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases