PETRIE RETAIL v. TOWN OF SECAUCUS


831 A.2d 106 (2003)

363 N.J. Super. 74

PETRIE RETAIL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Respondent, v. TOWN OF SECAUCUS, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Nashel, West New York, argued the cause for appellant (Nashel and Nashel, attorneys; Mr. Nashel, on the brief).

Paul Tannenbaum, Monroe Tp., argued the cause for respondent (Zipp & Tannenbaum, attorneys; Peter J. Zipp and Mr. Tannenbaum, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, WEFING and WECKER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Petrie Retail, Inc. appeals from the Tax Court's June 13, 2001 order which denied plaintiff interest on certain refunds paid by defendant Secaucus, as well as attorney's fees and costs. The defendant cross-appeals from the order which imposed certain interest payments on it. The Tax Court's decision appears at 19 N.J.Tax 356 (2001). We affirm.

These cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases