Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the two positive urinalysis test results and the testimony presented at the disciplinary hearing provide substantial evidence of his guilt (see Matter of Gonzalez v Selsky,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MADISON v. SELSKY
2 A.D.3d 934 (2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 709
In the Matter of DIALLO R.A. MADISON, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 4, 2003.
December 4, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.