Claimant was employed as an administrative assistant for a school custodian engineer, who also was her husband. When her husband was removed from his position, claimant failed to return to work because her husband informed her that when a custodian's secretary was also his wife, it was presumed that she left with him. Although she testified that she did not want to leave her job, she failed to inquire of her union as to whether she was required to leave her job. Inasmuch...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
