Defendant's argument that the evidence was legally insufficient because it was based upon inadequately corroborated accomplice testimony is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the corroboration requirement (CPL 60.22) was fully satisfied by the testimony of the victim's sister who placed the victim with defendant at the time of the murder and by a statement provided by defendant in which he admitted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
