SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL. CO. v. HAMIL

No. 2-02-387-CV.

116 S.W.3d 798 (2003)

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant and Appellee. v. Barry Michael HAMIL, Carolyn Kay Hamil Arnold, and Dorothy Hamil Trust, Appellees and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

August 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darrell L. Guy and Timothy A. Whitley, Dallas, for Appellants.

Jones & Cannon, P.C., and J. Kelly Jones and Michael Hassett, Arlington, for Appellee.

PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and HOLMAN, JJ.


OPINION

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

This is a trespass case. In four issues on appeal, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("SBC") contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and that the Hamils are not entitled to recover attorney's fees. SBC also complains that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of compromises and offers to compromise by both parties. On cross-appeal, the Hamils argue that the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases