1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 839 A.2d
  5. 839 A.2d 67 (2003)
 

STATE v. MALIK

839 A.2d 67 (2003)

365 N.J. Super. 267

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mohammad Saleem MALIK d/b/a Haji Saleem, a/k/a Mohammad Saleem, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 30, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jean M. Hartmann, Stanton Island, NY, argued the cause for appellant (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys, Livingston; Ms. Hartmann, of counsel, and on the brief).

Joie Piderit, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Piderit, of counsel, and on the brief).

Before Judges NEWMAN, PARRILLO and HOENS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, J.A.D.

At issue is the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9(c), which defendant contends contains a criminal proscription against corporate misconduct that is unconstitutionally vague as applied to individuals other than corporate officers and directors at whom, he maintains, the statute is exclusively directed. We disagree and find no constitutional infirmity in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases