1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 295 F.Supp.2d
  5. 295 F.Supp.2d 608 (2003)
 

U.S. v. MAYO

No. CRIM.2:02 CR 099.

295 F.Supp.2d 608 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America v. Edward F. MAYO, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

December 5, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Anthony Protogyrou, Protogyrou & Rigney PLC, Norfolk, VA, for Defendant.

Robert John Krask, U.S. Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Norfolk, VA.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUDSON, District Judge.

(Calculation of Actual Loss and Total Offense Level Under United States Sentencing Guidelines)

This case was before the Court for sentencing on November 21, 2003. At that time, the defendant, Edward F. Mayo, Jr. ("the defendant" or "Defendant Mayo") challenged the United States probation officer's calculation of his total offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. At issue was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases