1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 327 F.3d
  5. 327 F.3d 569 (2003)
 

SCHUSTER v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 01-3974.

327 F.3d 569 (2003)

Paul SCHUSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 28, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Fox (argued), Fox & Fox, Madison, WI, Michael Rachlis, Rachlis & Pick, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Charles C. Jackson (argued), Seyfarth Shaw, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POSNER, KANNE, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Paul Schuster brought this suit claiming that his employment with Lucent Technologies, Inc. ("Lucent") was terminated because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (2003). Lucent denied age was the motivation for the discharge, stating that Schuster was terminated as part of an effort to address adverse financial conditions and to eliminate overlapping management positions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases