Defendants' assertions that plaintiff's action to recover damages for breach of an employment contract should be dismissed because the "Letter of Intent" sued upon is not a binding agreement, and because plaintiff is, in any event, without standing to rely upon the letter, are without merit. That the document at issue is referred to as a "Letter of Intent" is not conclusive of whether it may be viewed as binding (see City of New York v Pennsylvania R.R. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HAJDU-NEMETH v. ZACHARIOU
309 A.D.2d 578 (2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 597
LASZLO HAJDU-NEMETH, Respondent, v. PETER ZACHARIOU et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 9, 2003.
Decided October 9, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
