1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 100 S.W.3d
  5. 100 S.W.3d 786 (2003)
 

HANCOCK v. SHOOK

No. SC 84509.

100 S.W.3d 786 (2003)

Glen L. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. William and Ruth SHOOK, d/b/a Barnes Feed Store, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Timothy E. Gammon, Springfield, for Appellant.

JoAnne S. Jackson, Michele Craycroft, John Housely, Springfield, for Respondents.

PRICE, J.

I.

Glen Hancock appeals a verdict in his favor of $12,500 against William and Ruth Shook, doing business as Barnes Feed Store. Mr. Hancock's dairy herd ingested feed purchased from the Shooks that was contaminated with a toxic mold. Mr. Hancock sought $600,000 in damages resulting from losses to his herd and decreased milk production. The judgment is affirmed.

II.

A. Background Facts

Glen Hancock is a dairy farmer and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases