On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 5, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. We note that the Court of Appeals application of a remedial preferential rule was unnecessary to its decision, because the court concluded that the plain language of the statute is unambiguous. Crowe v. City of Detroit,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
TREPANIER v. NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC.
Docket No. 121415, COA No. 224262.
655 N.W.2d 229 (2003)
Gary TREPANIER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 15, 2003.
January 15, 2003.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.