The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress statements. After the arresting officer administered Miranda warnings and asked defendant if he would answer questions, defendant stated that he wanted to wait to speak with a judge. This was not an unequivocal invocation of either his right to counsel (see People v Glover,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PIERRE
309 A.D.2d 570 (2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 344
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER PIERRE, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 9, 2003.
Decided October 9, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.