Although the record fails to support the presentment agency's claim that appellant consented to the disposition, we conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion when it imposed a conditional discharge. That disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant's needs and the need for protection of the community (see Matter of Katherine W.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.