Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the cause of action based on lack of informed consent. The plaintiffs failed to establish that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff Ana Hidalgo Trinidad were due, at least in part, to the absence of informed consent (see Public Health Law § 2805-d; Campea v Mitra,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.