ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ray G. Stout ("Stout") appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of stealing in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000) and one count of first degree tampering in violation of section 569.080 RSMo (2000). Stout argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial because Stout's unexplained possession of the items in question was neither sufficiently recent nor exclusive to support conviction. Stout also...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.