1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 845 A.2d
  5. 845 A.2d 1 (2003)
 

HUGHES v. INSLEY

No. 00558, September Term, 2002.

845 A.2d 1 (2003)

155 Md. App. 608

Margaret M. HUGHES v. William R. INSLEY, Jr., et al.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied March 8, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Hall (Alexis E. Kramer, on brief), Easton, for appellant.

Michael L. Pullen, Easton, for appellee.

Argued before SALMON, BARBERA, RAYMOND G. THIEME, JR. (Ret., Specially Assigned), JJ.

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SALMON, J.

Central to the resolution of the issues presented in this appeal is the application of the doctrine of claim preclusion.

The doctrine of res judicata (also called direct estoppel or claim preclusion) applies when the parties to a subsequent suit are the same or in privity with the parties to a prior suit; the first and second suits present the same claim or cause of action; and there was a final judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases