ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Montgomery appeals from the trial court's order of May 19, 2003, which we construe to be a denial of his motion to amend sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the appellant's motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
