1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 75 (2003)
 

CITY OF SANTA PAULA v. NARULA

No. B160389.

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 75 (2003)

114 Cal.App.4th 485

CITY OF SANTA PAULA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Mohan NARULA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

Rehearing Denied January 9, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Blinn Maxwell, Schroeder Comis Nelson & Kahn and Anson M. Whitfield, Oxnard, for Defendants and Appellants.

Philip H. Romney and Karl H. Berger, City Attorneys; Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones & Schneider, and Peter D. Lemmon, Ventura, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

GILBERT, P.J.

Attorney fees are permitted when authorized by contract, statute or law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(10).) A city ordinance allows the city to collect attorney fees incurred in foreclosing a lien on real property. Just as "... a rose is a rose ..." so is an ordinance a statute when it permits recovery of attorney fees.1

Mohan and Sylvia Conway Narula (the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases