1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 279 F.Supp.2d
  5. 279 F.Supp.2d 554 (2003)
 

RICOH CO., LTD. v. AEROFLEX INC.

No. Civ.A. 03-103 GMS.

279 F.Supp.2d 554 (2003)

RICOH COMPANY, LTD, Plaintiff, v. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International Corp., and Matrox Tech, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 29, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Whetzel, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff.

Francis DiGiovanni, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Robert Scott Saunders, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, George Pazuniak, Josy W. Ingersoll, John W. Shaw, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SLEET, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On January 21, 2003, the plaintiff, Ricoh Company, Ltd. ("Ricoh") filed the above-captioned patent infringement action against the above-named defendants. In its complaint, Ricoh alleges that each of the defendants infringes its U.S. Patent No. 4,992,432 ("the '432 patent") by "using, offering to sell, and/or by selling and/or importing into the United States application specific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases