WEAKLAND v. TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC.

Docket No. 119495.

656 N.W.2d 175 (2003)

Harry E. WEAKLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. TOLEDO ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., USF & G/ST. Paul Insurance Company, and Second Injury Fund, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 4, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levine, Benjamin, Tushman, Bratt, Jerris & Stein, P.C. (by Charles P. Burbach), Southfield, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Lacey & Jones (by Michael T. Reinholm), Birmingham, for defendants-cross-appellants.


PER CURIAM.

I

In this worker's compensation matter, we are called on to construe the statutory provision that places the obligation on the employer to supply the injured employee with appliances that are necessary to alleviate the effects of the work-related injury. MCL 418.315(1). We affirm the Worker's Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) decision that only the modifications to a van constitute appliances within the meaning of subsection 315(1) of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases