1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 81 P.3d
  5. 81 P.3d 749 (2003)
 

MARRIAGE OF CONRAD

C97-4328DR; A118788.

81 P.3d 749 (2003)

191 Or. App. 283

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Joy Renee CONRAD, Respondent, and Wade Harold Conrad, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 17, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Hobson, Jr., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Hobson & Angell, L.L.P.

Dylan M. Cernitz argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Peterson, Peterson & Cernitz, L.L.P.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and BREWER, Judge.

BREWER, J.

Husband appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to reopen the parties' dissolution case. He argues that wife committed intrinsic fraud by falsely representing during the dissolution trial that she did not own certain property and that the trial court erred in concluding that ORS 107.452, the statutory foundation for husband's motion, does not provide relief for that type of fraud.1 We reverse and remand.

The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases