Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The showup identifications occurred within very close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime and were part of an unbroken chain of events. The fact that a witness had already identified defendant did not render the showup inappropriate, and there was nothing unduly suggestive about the manner in which the showup was conducted (see People v Duuvon,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
