ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. GINSBERG

No. 99-10983.

351 F.3d 473 (2003)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Victor GINSBERG, Elaine A. Scarfo, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

DECIDED November 14, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice J. Baumgarten, Anania, Bandklayder & Blackwell, Miami, FL, Martha Ann Chapman, Orlando, FL, for Ginsberg and Scarfo.

David Bryan Shelton, Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

Before ANDERSON and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

This appeal involves a declaratory judgment action brought by Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity Company asking the district court to declare whether they had a duty to defend their insured, Victor Ginsburg, in Elaine A. Scarfo's state court invasion of privacy action against him. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of Allstate. The district court concluded that Scarfo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases