Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the use of deadly physical force to prevent the commission of a robbery (see Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [b]). Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to the defendant (see People v Watts,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.