Clelan DUDEK and Lois Dudek, Petitioners,
v.
UMATILLA COUNTY and Danny R. Smith, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted October 3, 2002.
Decided May 15, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Douglas E. Hojem, Pendleton, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Corey, Byler, Rew, Lorenzen & Hojem.
D. Rahn Hostetter argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Danny R. Smith.
No appearance for respondent Umatilla County.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and KISTLER, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
DEITS, C.J.
Petitioners1 seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision affirming Umatilla County's grant of a partitioning request. The county's decision included a determination that a portion of the Umatilla County Development Ordinance (UCDO)2 need not be applied to the partitioning. The applicant before the county, Danny R. Smith (respondent),3 sought to partition...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.