HIXSON v. SARKESIAN

Nos. S-10316, S-10335.

66 P.3d 753 (2003)

Elizabeth M.S. HIXSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Michael S. SARKESIAN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

March 28, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth M.S. Hixson, pro se.

Keith B. Levy, Law Office of Keith B. Levy, Juneau, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, and BRYNER, Justices.


OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court granted Michael S. Sarkesian's motion to modify child support. Elizabeth M.S. Hixson argues that the superior court erred in calculating Michael's income and that the superior court should have enforced an earlier settlement agreement for child support above that required by Alaska Civil Rule 90.3. Michael S. Sarkesian filed a cross-appeal claiming that his alimony obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases