1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 131 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 680 (2003)
 

GRYCZMAN v. 4550 PICO PARTNERS, LTD.

No. B155539.

131 Cal.Rptr.2d 680 (2003)

107 Cal.App.4th 1

Steve GRYCZMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. 4550 PICO PARTNERS, LTD. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

March 17, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard S. Fredman, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dan Glaser for Defendants and Appellants.

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff Steve Gryczman alleges defendant 4550 Pico Partners, Ltd. (Pico) conveyed certain real property to a second defendant, Kital-Pico, LCC, without affording him notice and opportunity to exercise his right of first refusal as required by a contract between him and Pico. The trial court dismissed the action on the ground it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Finding this is an appropriate case to apply the delayed discovery rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases