Even if we were to find that defendant's motion to suppress a shopping bag and stolen merchandise seized outside the store should have been granted, we would find the error to be harmless in view of the overwhelming independent evidence of the robbery inside the store, including multiple eyewitness testimony and surveillance tapes (see People v Crimmins,
We perceive no basis for reducing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.