1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 340 F.3d
  5. 340 F.3d 459 (2003)
 

U.S. v. PEARSON

Nos. 02-4356, 03-1005, 03-1232.

340 F.3d 459 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas N. PEARSON and Arthur M. Hawkins, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 14, 2003.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied October 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miriam F. Miquelon (argued), Office of the United States Attorney Criminal Division, Fairview Heights, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Harold J. Ruvoldt (argued), Edwards & Angell, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant, Douglas N. Pearson.

Oscar Stilley (argued), Fort Smith, AR, for Defendant-Appellant, Arthur M. Hawkins.

Before ROVNER, DIANE P. WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 14, 2003*.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Arthur Hawkins and Douglas Pearson were convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud based on their participation in a bribery scheme that facilitated the distribution of their company's defective batteries. Hawkins and Pearson appeal their convictions, arguing, among other things, that they should not have been tried on a superceding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases