LIN v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

No. Civ.A. 02-CV-3612.

293 F.Supp.2d 505 (2003)

Dr. Manhua Mandy LIN, Plaintiff, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

November 13, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh J. Hutchison, Leonard Tillery & Sciolla LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Lead Attorney, Attorney to be Noticed, for Manhua Mandy Lin, Dr., Plaintiff.

Raymond A. Kresge, Klett, Rooney, Lieber & Schorling, Philadelphia, PA, Lead Attorney, Attorney to be Noticed, for Rohm and Haas Company, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Rohm and Haas Company. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint asserts claims of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and 43 P.S. § 955(d); defamation; false light invasion of privacy; intentional infliction of emotional distress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases